🔗 Share this article

Australia's bold action to restrict social media access for young people below 16 is creating waves worldwide. Politicians, child protection groups, and families are watching closely to see if this tactic will inspire imitation for the rest of the world.

Across Europe Momentum

Throughout Europe, a rising group of states are exploring comparable restrictions.

• Denmark plans a ban on social media for children under fifteen, with the PM stating that mobile devices and apps are "stealing our children's youth". The policy could be passed in the coming year.
• Norway is preparing to implement a minimum age limit of 15, citing the need to safeguard the young from the "influence of the recommendation systems".
• Ireland is working on a online verification tool to confirm the user details of social media account holders. The media minister have stated that an similar ban could be "a potential measures in reserve".
• In The Spanish government, the leader has urged the legislature to pass a bill raising the access age for accessing social media to 16.
• In France, the head of state has floated the idea of a ban for children below 15, and a government panel has suggested a related action, including an overnight "digital curfew" for older teenagers.
• The government in The Netherlands has recommended parents to block their children from social media before 15.

At the EU level, the EU parliament has adopted a non-binding resolution demanding a ban for under-16s unless parental consent is given. While it warns of the "compulsive" nature of these services, the move does not establish binding law.

"A strong age barrier is a solid starting point," commented the MEP supporting the measure.

The UK: A Cautious Eye

For the United Kingdom, the government has remained open to a potential ban, emphasizing that "nothing is discarded" but insisting any action must be "grounded in conclusive evidence".

Last year, interest built behind a legislative effort to enact controls on social media use by under-16s, but it was ultimately watered down. However, the administration committed to further research the matter.

Campaign organizations have expressed apprehensions. An organization founded by the relatives of a teenager who died after encountering harmful platform posts argues that a simple age ban might not make platforms safer and could lead to a "sudden drop-off" of harm when users become eligible.

"The Australian ban is a response to the inability of the Silicon Valley to create platforms and apps that are appropriate and fit for young users," stated a influential child protection advocate.

The US: A Decentralized Picture

Across America, regulation is primarily happening at the regional level amid country-wide stalemate.

• Utah requires parental consent for under-18s to use social media and restricts overnight use.
• The state of Florida has enacted a law barring children under fourteen from joining social media, though it is subject to constitutional disputes.
• Virginia has enacted a law limiting minors to a single hour of social media time per day, with additional use requiring parental permission.
• The state of Georgia, Tennessee, and Louisiana have likewise enacted bills mandating parental consent for teenagers to open social media profiles.

Even with cross-party agreement and calls from certain individuals to copy the Australian lead, a nationwide ban is currently seen as unlikely.

International Outlook

Beyond Europe and the US, other countries are similarly exploring options.

• Malaysia plans to prohibit social media for teenagers starting from next year.
• The Brazilian authorities has increased the required age for the platform Instagram to 16.

Yet, world agencies strike a more cautious position. Unicef has warned that age-based restrictions pose dangers and "may even have unintended consequences". The agency points out that online platforms can be a "vital connection" for vulnerable children and that government action should not be a "substitute" for platform operators to prioritize safety.

As this worldwide conversation continues, the steps of this nation and others indicate that policymakers globally are increasingly willing to delay for the industry to self-regulate.